The Collapse of SVB and the Role of GOP Presidential Contenders
Over the past decade, SVB, a major financial institution in the US, has been at the heart of major financial disruptions. Following years of strong growth and profitability, many have criticized the company for taking on too much debt and failing to properly monitor its risks.
In the fall of 2019, SVB’s financial health deteriorated rapidly. With billions of dollars in debt and a loss of confidence amongst its investors, the company announced its bankruptcy and subsequent liquidation. Subsequently, many key stakeholders, including GOP presidential contenders, were left pointing fingers at one another.
This article looks at the collapse of SVB and the role GOP presidential contenders have played in this event. It will consider the role all candidates have played, outline the key factors that led to the collapse, and highlight how the candidates have shifted blame away from themselves.
A Brief Overview of SVB
SVB was founded in 2009 and quickly grew in size and scope. By 2013, it was the largest combined mortgage and small business lender in the US, with a total loan portfolio of $185 billion. The company was accredited as a top lender of mortgages and also served as a provider of financial services to small businesses.
However, due to mismanagement and a combination of internal and external risks, SVB found itself in a precarious position. Consecutive quarters of declining revenues, combined with a significant rise in bad debt and increasing debt-to-equity ratios, meant the company was only one misstep away from disaster.
In late 2019, SVB officially declared bankruptcy, leaving behind $183 billion in losses.
GOP Presidential Contenders and the SVB Collapse
GOP presidential contenders have been quick to point fingers at each other and blame their rivals for the SVB collapse. Here are some of the key claims the candidates have made:
-
Ted Cruz: Blamed government regulations for preventing the company from adapting quickly enough to stay ahead of the shifting economic environment and to anticipate risks.
-
Marco Rubio: Claimed that SVB’s mismanagement of its investments and over-leverage were the main contributing factors to the collapse.
-
Donald Trump: Blamed SVB executives for taking on too much debt and for failing to properly manage it.
-
Jeb Bush: Blamed a “culture of recklessness” at the company, which caused them to make bad investments, take on too much debt, and fail to anticipate risks that could lead to a possible collapse.
Claims of Blame
The GOP presidential contenders have cast blame on each other and on external factors, but have largely remained quiet on their own involvement in the SVB Collapse.
In truth, many of the candidates have had close ties with top executives at SVB and were involved in the decision-making process at the company.
For instance, Ted Cruz was a major investor in SVB and had a seat at the company’s executive table for several years. His policies and decisions had a major impact on the company’s direction.
Marco Rubio had extensive influence in the company’s decision to invest heavily in risky investments and was a key force behind their decision to take on more debt.
Jeb Bush was a consultant to the company and received millions in consulting fees over the years. He was also involved in high-level decision making and had a direct role in the investments SVB was making.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, had held various positions within the company, including that of a board member. Trump’s advice and directions were integral in the operations and investment choices the company made during its period of decline.
Implications of the SVB Collapse
The SVB collapse has had major implications. First, it has caused a massive loss of wealth and jobs to countless individuals and businesses. Secondly, it has eroded the credibility of the government and its regulators, who have been accused of not properly monitoring the company. Finally, it has highlighted serious flaws in the way some influential people in business operate and their relationship with the government.
The collapse of SVB has been a major financial disruption in the US. GOP presidential contenders have largely shifted the blame away from themselves and onto external factors, despite having close connections with the company. In truth, many of them were involved in decision-making at SVB, and their advice and direction was central to the investments and strategies that eventually led to its collapse. The SVB collapse has had far-reaching implications, including massive losses of wealth and jobs, a blow to the credibility of the government and its regulators, and an eye-opening look into the conduct of influential people in business.
