The Price of Inequality: Joseph Stiglitz’s Critique of Neoliberalism
The modern economy has been the focus of much political debate in the past few decades, with both sides of the political aisle vying for the most economically efficient systems. In the United States and in many developed countries, the reigning economic policy has been neoliberalism since the Reagan era. This system is based on reducing government’s role in the economy and providing less social safety nets.
Joseph Stiglitz, professor at Columbia University and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics, has been one of the most vocal critics of this neoliberalism, claiming that the wealthy elite benefit disproportionately while the average citizens suffer. Using the weight of his academic influence, Stiglitz has argued extensively for greater levels of economic regulation, higher taxes on the wealthy, and the introduction of various social programs to help those in the lower classes. This article will serve to outline some of Stiglitz’s core beliefs regarding the economics of inequality and the problems associated with neoliberalism.
Inequality and its Sources
To begin, it is important to explain what inequality is and where it comes from. In simplest terms, inequality is the difference between the lowest and highest economic classes within a given society. In an extreme case, this might be the difference between poverty and a billionaire, but it also applies to subtler cases, such as the gulf between sections of cities or the differences between different professions. Where does this difference come from? Inequality increases when capital and opportunity are not evenly distributed. If one group of citizens has access to better schools, more capital, and better job opportunities, then they will be more likely to out-earn other groups. Inequality is also caused by different expectations surrounding different professions. For example, doctors tend to be higher earners because they require extensive training and deal with risk on a daily basis.
Stiglitz’s Critique of Neoliberalism
Joseph Stiglitz is an outspoken critic of neoliberalism, claiming that it creates and increases inequality, leading to further financial stress for the middle and lower classes. He claims that neoliberal policies focus on propping up large businesses and the wealthy at the expense of the people. He outlines several unique issues that this causes.
-
The Focus on Short-Term Profits: According to Stiglitz, neoliberalism encourages businesses to focus on short-term profits by reducing taxes and removing regulations. This is problematic because it means that businesses do not have to invest in the long-term viability of their products and services. They can make quick profits with minimal effort, leading to an overall decrease in quality of goods. For everyday people, this means lower-quality products at higher prices.
-
Regressive Taxation: Neoliberal policies often involve reducing taxes on the wealthy and raising taxes or adjusting benefit structures in ways that affect the lower and middle classes. This creates a system where the wealthy can accumulate more capital while the rest of society suffers or even goes further into debt.
-
Market Failure: Stiglitz also claims that markets cannot function efficiently if they are not regulated. Removing regulations in an attempt to maximize profits means that businesses can act out of selfish motives and exploit their customers or other stakeholders. Without regulation, Stiglitz fears that inequality will continue to increase and more people will suffer from the associated economic effects.
-
Inequality in Employment and Benefits: Stiglitz has argued that neoliberalism has led to employers offering fewer benefits and fewer chances for job security, resulting in a precarious working environment that creates even more economic stress for those in lower classes.
Stiglitz’s Proposed Solutions
In the face of such a critique, one might wonder what Stiglitz proposes as solutions. He has several main points, but they can all be summarized thusly: taxation should be restructured so that taxes are higher on the wealthy and lower on the middle and lower classes, and regulations should be put in place to protect from exploitation and ensure economic stability.
-
Tax Increases on Wealthy: Stiglitz proposes that the wealthy should be taxed at a much higher rate than the middle and lower classes. He argues that the wealthy have much more economic power and should pay for programs that help those in lower classes, as well as for other public services.
-
Tax Breaks for Lower Classes: Stiglitz believes that a more equitable system would involve tax cuts for lower and middle income classes. This would give ordinary citizens more money to spend, which in turn would stimulate the economy as a whole by providing more demand.
-
Regulations: Stiglitz also proposes that legislation should be put in place to protect citizens from exploitation and fraud. He believes that regulations should be designed to protect people from abuses of power and ensure that businesses act within the law. For Stiglitz, this is essential to a equitable economy and he claims that regulations are necessary to put an end to the “race to the bottom” of neoliberalism.
Joseph Stiglitz is one of the most influential economists in the world today and his critique of neoliberalism is one that has been echoed by many left and center-left economists. His proposals for restructuring the economy towards greater equity and protection from exploitation are also gaining more traction in the current political climate. Whether or not his solutions will be appropriated in a meaningful way remains to be seen, but his critique of the modern economy should not be overlooked. Whatever one’s opinion on neoliberalism, it is clear that, according to Stiglitz, the price of inequality is too high to pay.
